Refine
Year of publication
- 2018 (15) (remove)
Document Type
- Conference proceeding (11)
- Journal article (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (15)
Institute
- Informatik (15)
Publisher
- RWTH Aachen (4)
- Springer (2)
- ACM (1)
- IEEE (1)
- IGI Global (1)
- Lund University (1)
- Riga Technical University Press (1)
- SCITEPRESS (1)
- Springer Science + Business Media B.V (1)
Digitization of societies changes the way we live, work, learn, communicate, and collaborate. In the age of digital transformation IT environments with a large number of rather small structures like Internet of Things (IoT), microservices, or mobility systems are emerging to support flexible and agile digitized products and services. Adaptable ecosystems with service oriented enterprise architectures are the foundation for self-optimizing, resilient run-time environments and distributed information systems. The resulting business disruptions affect almost all new information processes and systems in the context of digitization. Our aim are more flexible and agile transformations of both business and information technology domains with more flexible enterprise information systems through adaptation and evolution of digital enterprise architectures. The present research paper investigates mechanisms for decision-controlled digitization architectures for Internet of Things and microservices by evolving enterprise architecture reference models and state of the art elements for architectural engineering for micro-granular systems.
The digital transformation of our life changes the way we work, learn, communicate, and collaborate. Enterprises are presently transforming their strategy, culture, processes, and their information systems to become digital. The digital transformation deeply disrupts existing enterprises and economies. Digitization fosters the development of IT systems with many rather small and distributed structures, like Internet of Things, Microservices and mobile services. Since years a lot of new business opportunities appear using the potential of services computing, Internet of Things, mobile systems, big data with analytics, cloud computing, collaboration networks, and decision support. Biological metaphors of living and adaptable ecosystems provide the logical foundation for self optimizing and resilient run-time environments for intelligent business services and adaptable distributed information systems with service oriented enterprise architectures. This has a strong impact for architecting digital services and products following both a value-oriented and a service perspective. The change from a closed world modeling world to a more flexible open-world composition and evolution of enterprise architectures defines the moving context for adaptable and high distributed systems, which are essential to enable the digital transformation. The present research paper investigates the evolution of Enterprise Architecture considering new defined value-oriented mappings between digital strategies, digital business models and an improved digital enterprise architecture.
In current times, a lot of new business opportunities appeared using the potential of the Internet and related digital technologies, like Internet of Things, services computing, cloud computing, big data with analytics, mobile systems, collaboration networks, and cyber physical systems. Enterprises are presently transforming their strategy, culture, processes, and their information systems to become more digital. The digital transformation deeply disrupts existing enterprises and economies. Digitization fosters the development of IT environments with many rather small and distributed structures, like Internet of Things. This has a strong impact for architecting digital services and products. The change from a closed-world modeling perspective to more flexible open-world and living software and system architectures defines the moving context for adaptable and evolutionary software approaches, which are essential to enable the digital transformation. In this paper, we are putting a spotlight to service oriented software evolution to support the digital transformation with micro granular digital architectures for digital services and products.
Maintainability assurance techniques are used to control this quality attribute and limit the accumulation of potentially unknown technical debt. Since the industry state of practice and especially the handling of service- and microservice-based systems in this regard are not well covered in scientific literature, we created a survey to gather evidence for a) used processes, tools, and metrics in the industry, b) maintainability-related treatment of systems based on service orientation, and c) influences on developer satisfaction w.r.t. maintainability. 60 software professionals responded to our online questionnaire. The results indicate that using explicit and systematic techniques has benefits for maintainability. The more sophisticated the applied methods the more satisfied participants were with the maintainability of their software while no link to a hindrance in productivity could be established. Other important findings were the absence of architecture-level evolvability control mechanisms as well as a significant neglect of service-oriented particularities for quality assurance. The results suggest that industry has to improve its quality control in these regards to avoid problems with long living service-based software systems.
To bring a pattern-based perspective to the SOA vs. microservices discussion, we qualitatively analyzed a total of 118 SOA patterns from 2 popular catalogs for their (partial) applicability to microservices. Patterns had to hold up to 5 derived microservices principles to be applicable. 74 patterns (63%) were categorized as fully applicable, 30 (25%) as partially applicable, and 14 (12%) as not applicable. Most frequently violated microservices characteristics werde Decentralization and Single System. The findings suggest that microservices and SOA share a large set of architectural principles and solutions in the general space of service-based systems while only having a small set of differences in specific areas.
While there are several theoretical comparisons of Object Orientation (OO) and Service Orientation (SO), little empirical research on the maintainability of the two paradigms exists. To provide support for a generalizable comparison, we conducted a study with four related parts. Two functionally equivalent systems (one OO and one SO version) were analyzed with coupling and cohesion metrics as well as via a controlled experiment, where participants had to extend the systems. We also conducted a survey with 32 software professionals and interviewed 8 industry experts on the topic. Results indicate that the SO version of our system possesses a higher degree of cohesion, a lower degree of coupling, and could be extended faster. Survey and interview results suggest that industry sees systems built with SO as more loosely coupled, modifiable, and reusable. OO systems, however, were described as less complex and easier to test.
Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) systems are key to managing risks threatening modern enterprises from many different angles. Key constituent to GRC systems is the definition of controls that are implemented on the different layers of an Enterprise Architecture (EA). As part of the compliance aspect of GRC, the effectiveness of these controls is assessed and reported to relevant management bodies within the enterprise. In this paper we present a metamodel which links controls to the affected elements of an EA and supplies a way of expressing associated assessment techniques and results. We complement the metamodel with an expository instantiation in a cockpit for control compliance applied in an international enterprise in the insurance industry.
Modeling interactive Enterprise Architecture visualizations: an extended architecture description
(2018)
Enterprise architectures consist of a multitude of architecture elements, which relate in manifold ways to each other. Due to the high number of relationships between these elements, architectural analysis mechanisms are essential for all stakeholders to keep track and to work out relevant model characteristics. In practice EAs are often analyzed using visualizations by hand. However, the visualizations are often static and there are only few interaction possibilities. As a result, new visualizations have to be created or configured by experts if information demands change. In addition, hardly any tools are used for analysis of complex model characteristics. In this article we introduce an extended conceptualization of the architecture description that defines the structure of interactive visualizations and the integration of further tools to flexibly respond to the information demands of stakeholders. In addition, we develop a so-called Architecture Cockpit that realizes the extended conceptualization in a prototype. At the end we demonstrate and evaluate our approach through a practical test in a company in the finance and insurance industry.
Unternehmen stehen aktuell aufgrund der Digitalisierung, des stetigen technologischen Fortschritts und immer kürzer werdenden Produktlebenszyklen vor großen Herausforderungen. Um am Markt bestehen zu können, müssen Geschäftsmodelle öfter und schneller an sich verändernde Marktverhältnisse angepasst werden als dies früher der Fall war. Eine schnelle Anpassungsfähigkeit, auch Agilität genannt, ist in der heutigen Zeit ein entscheidender Wettbewerbsfaktor. Aufgrund des stetig wachsenden IT Anteils in Produkten sowie der Tatsache, dass diese IT-gestützt hergestellt werden, haben Änderungen des Geschäftsmodells große Auswirkungen auf die Unternehmensarchitektur eines Unternehmens.
Eine Unternehmensarchitektur umspannt das Unternehmen, indem diese die fachlichen und technischen Strukturen, insbesondere die gesamte IT, des Unternehmens beinhaltet und integriert. Das Management der Unternehmensarchitektur ist die Disziplin zur Beherrschung und Abstimmung dieser Strukturen. An der Gestaltung der Unternehmensarchitektur wirken viele Stakeholder mit individuellen und teils gegensätzlichen Interessen aus den unterschiedlichsten Bereichen des Unternehmens mit. Dies macht die Entscheidungsfindung zu einer komplexen Aufgabe.
Die in dieser Arbeit entworfene integrative Methode für die Entscheidungsfindung hat das Ziel, die Betroffenen und Beteiligten, im Folgenden Stakeholder, bei ihren Entscheidungen zu unterstützen. Die Grundidee hierbei ist die systematische Einbeziehung der Interessen der Stakeholder und davon abgeleiteter Visualisierungen. Dies verleiht der Methode ihren integrativen Charakter und hilft Abhängigkeiten zwischen Stakeholdern zu erkennen. Dadurch wird die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den an Entscheidungen beteiligten Stakeholdern gefördert. Neben der systematischen Einbeziehung von Visualisierungen wird im Rahmen dieser Arbeit das Konzept der Technik eingeführt. Techniken werden ebenfalls von den Interessen der Stakeholder abgeleitet und dienen der Unterstützung bei der Durchführung von Aktivitäten der Entscheidungsfindung, indem Vorgehensweisen bei bestimmten Aufgaben vorgegeben oder Teilprozesse der Entscheidungsfindung sogar automatisiert durchgeführt werden. Das Konzept der Technik, die systematische Ableitung von den Interessen der Stakeholder sowie das Zusammenspiel mit Visualisierungen wird in dieser Arbeit in Form einer erweiterten Konzeptualisierung der Architekturbeschreibung definiert.
Da die Werkzeugunterstützung in der Praxis häufig eine Herausforderung darstellt, rundet diese Arbeit ein eigens konzipiertes und prototypisch validiertes Architekturcockpit ab. Das Cockpit ist eine auf einem elektronischen Sitzungsraum basierende Werkzeugunterstützung der eingeführten integrativen Methode.
Digital enterprise architecture management in tourism : state of the art and future directions
(2018)
The advance of information technology impacts tourism more than many other industries, due to the service character of its products. Most offerings in tourism are immaterial in nature and challenging in coordination. Therefore, the alignment of IT and strategy and digitization is of crucial importance to enterprises in tourism. To cope with the resulting challenges, methods for the management of enterprise architectures are necessary. Therefore, we scrutinize approaches for managing enterprise architectures based on a literature research. We found many areas for future research on the use of enterprise architecture in tourism.