Refine
Document Type
- Journal article (25)
- Conference proceeding (13)
- Working Paper (4)
- Book (1)
- Report (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (44)
Institute
- ESB Business School (44) (remove)
Publisher
- MIT Center for Information Systems Research (16)
- Association for Information Systems (AIS) (10)
- Hochschule Reutlingen (2)
- MIT (2)
- The Kelley School of Business, Indiana University (2)
- Center for Information Systems Research (1)
- Curran Associates Inc. (1)
- Harvard Business School (1)
- Harvard Business School Publ. (1)
- Indiana University (1)
New digital technologies present both game-changing opportunities for—and existential threats to—companies whose success was built in the pre-digital economy. This article describes our findings from a study of 25 companies that were embarking on digital transformation journeys. We identified two digital strategies—customer engagement and digitized solutions—that provide direction for a digital transformation. Two technology-enabled assets are essential for executing those strategies: an operational backbone and a digital services platform. We describe how a big old company can combine these elements to navigate its digital transformation.
Most digital innovations fail when they transition from the exploring to the scaling stage. We describe how freeyou, the digital innovation spinoff of a major German insurer, successfully scaled online-only car insurance, focusing particularly on how it managed the IT-related challenges. The stark differences between the stages required very different approaches to application development, IT organization and data analytics. Based on freeyou’s experience, we provide recommendations for successful transitioning from exploring to scaling.
Recent digital technologies like the Internet of Things and Augmented Reality have brought IT into companies’ core products. What were previously purely physical products are becoming hybrid or digitized. Despite receiving a lot of recent attention, digitized products have only seen a slow uptake in businesses so far. In this paper, we study the challenges that keep companies from realizing the desired impacts of digitized products and the practices they employ to address these challenges. To do so, we looked at companies from a set of industries that are highly affected by digital transformation, but at the same time hesitant to move to a more digitized world: the creative industries. Based on a literature review and twelve interviews in creative industries, we developed a conceptual model that can serve as a basis for formulating testable hypotheses for further research in this area.
Im Projekt wurden die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung und der Nutzen digital physischer Produkte in der Kreativwirtschaft untersucht, sowie sich bei der Herstellung digital-physischer Produkte ergebende Herausforderungen und Praktiken zu deren Überwindung. Hierzu wurden eine Literaturrecherche, qualitative Interviews und eine Umfrage durchgeführt. Abschließend wurden einzelne Firmen der Kreativwirtschaft fallstudienhaft untersucht.
Die Ergebnisse haben wir zu folgenden Kernbotschaften verdichtet:
Digital-physische Produkte sind derzeit noch nicht sehr weit verbreitet in der Kreativwirtschaft und nur wenige Firmen sind bereits an deren Erstellung beteiligt.
Für Firmen der Kreativwirtschaft, die bereits digital-physische Produkte herstellen, haben solche Produkte bisher eine geringe wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Dagegen wird die strategische Bedeutung schon heute als hoch eingeschätzt und Firmen erwarten durchschnittlich eine Verdopplung der wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung (Anteil am Umsatz >50%) in den nächsten drei Jahren.
Firmen, die ihre digital-physischen Produkte als erfolgreich einschätzen, geben an, sich stark auf das physische Produkt zu fokussieren: Synergien werden zwischen physischen und digitalen Angeboten geschaffen, physische Produkte werden durch digitale Komponenten attraktiver gestaltet und die digitale Anreichung physischer Produkte dient als Marketing-Tool. Firmen geben an, dass dies zu einer Steigerung des Absatzes und der Zufriedenheit bestehender Kunden des bisher rein physischen Produktes führt.
The proliferation of convergence of digital technologies SMACIT (social, mobile, analytics, cloud, and Internet of Things) has created significant threats and opportunities to established companies. Business leaders must rethink their business strategies and develop what we refer to as a digital strategy. Our research shows four keys to successfully defining and executing a digital strategy:
1. zeroing in on a customer engagement or digitized solutions strategy to guide the transformation, 2. building operational excellence, 3. creating a powerful digital services backbone to facilitate rapid innovation and responsiveness, and 4. ensuring ongoing organizational redesign. A list of publications from the research is provided at the end of this document.
The digital economy poses existential threats to — and game-changing opportunities for — companies that were successful in the pre-digital economy. What will distinguish those companies that successfully transform from those that become historical footnotes? This is the question a group of six researchers and consultants from Boston Consulting Group set out to examine. The team conducted in-depth interviews with senior executives at twenty-seven companies in different industries to explore the strategies and organizational initiatives they relied on to seize the opportunities associated with new, readily accessible digital technologies. This paper summarizes findings from this research and offers recommendations to business leaders responsible for digital business success.
To deliver on a digital value proposition, companies must fundamentally re-architect. In other words, they must redesign their processes, systems, roles, data, and habits to allow them to iteratively create, enhance, an replace digital offerings. This briefing examines how Royal Philips is transforming its value proposition - and its entire company - to seize the opportunities presented by digital technologies.
Successful digital business strategies rely less on strategic analysis and big bets than on experiments and learning. Consider, for example, that Airbnb grew out of the belief that people would pay to sleep on air mattress on a stranger's floor. Similarly, Instagram started as an app for checking in and hanging out with friends (and sharing pictures) that proved complicated to use. Twitter's founders had first tried a podcasting platform, Odeo, which Apple made obsolete with iTunes. AUDI AG had to kill of its "share a car with five friends" app before rolling out more successful mobility services in a number of countries. The digital successes did not grow out of a comprehensive upfront analysis. Digital strategy emerges from an idea - often, not a particularly good idea.
The digital economy has created intense demands for innovations. Companies are responding in part by creating new digital products and services to meet increasing customer expectations.
MIT CISR findings indicate that product variety is NOT directly related to firm performance, and IS related to increased difficulties for costumers and employees.
Successful digital offerings are created at the intersection of what technologies can deliver and what customers want and will pay for. That point of intersection, however, has proved to be elusive. To find it, companies must experiment repeatedly, cocreate with customers, and assemble cross-functional development teams - and the insights gleaned along the way must be shared internally.
In this article, we discuss how several of the nearly 200 companies we've studied have built and exercised these capabilities. We also take a close look at how one company, Schneider Electric, is using them to acquire and share customer insights.
"Designed for digital" offers practical advice on digital transformation, with examples that include Amazon, BNY Mellon, DBS Bank, LEGO, Philips, Schneider Electric, USAA, and many other global organizations. Drawing on five years of research and in-depth case studies, the book is an essential guide for companies that want to disrupt rather than be disrupted in the new digital landscape.
Established companies are facing two transformations involving digital technologies: becoming digitized and becoming digital. The platforms enabling these transformations are fundamentally different in their purpose, target state, success metrics — and especially, in the key responsibilities of senior leaders. Because of these differences, companies will need to apply new rules new roles, processes, metrics, and norms — to the new digital platform. To develop new rules leaders should (1) separate the teams working on the digital platform, (2) allow digital platform leaders to experiment with new rules, and (3) identify new leaders and coach them to succeed with new rules. Given the time it takes to establish new rules, companies need to start breaking old rules now.
The use of digital, IT-based components in physical products is becoming increasingly relevant in practice. Surprisingly, the strategic impact of these "digitized products" has not received a lot of attention in IS research so far. Extant papers on the topic rely on ambiguous terminology (e.g., "smart products", "cyber-physical systems", "digital product-service systems") and underlying concepts differ widely. Based on an extensive literature review, this article provides an overview of the different terms and identifies five conceptual elements that form the building blocks of digitized products in research: "hybridity" (i.e., the combination of digital and physical components), connectivity, smartness, digitized product-service bundles (servitization of digitized products), and digitized product ecosystems. The implication for practitioners is that each element comes with different managerial challenges that companies need to address when incorporating the respective element in their products. The research implication is that each conceptual element is supported by different theoretical streams.
Digital technologies are moving into physical products. Smart cars, connected lightbulbs and data-generating tennis rackets are examples of previously “pure” physical products that turned into “digitized products”. Digitizing products offers many use cases for consumers that will hopefully persuade them to buy these products. Yet, as revenues from selling digitized products will remain small in the near future, digitized product manufacturers have to look for other sources of benefits. Producer-side use cases describe how manufacturers can benefit internally from the digitized products they produce. Our article identifies three categories of such use cases: product-, service-, and process-related ones.
As businesses grow and diversify, they almost inevitably make their range of offerings more complex. Complexity brings costs - but smart use of today’s digital technologies can help companies finesse the trade-offs between complexity´s costs and benefits. Imagine a retailer that has 10 million products and hundreds of variations for each product yet keeps it simple for customers to make a choice. Impossible? Not today. Amazon.com Inc. creates value from its product complexity with simple customer-facing processes, such as search, ratings, reviews and suggestions. Now imagine a diversified high-tech company with locally differentiated products in 60 categories in more than 100 different countries. A mess of internal processes and systems? Not necessarily. Royal Philips creates value by providing locally relevant products to different markets, while keeping the vast majority of its processes standardized on digitized platforms. Until now, managing business complexity has usually involved a trade-off. This trade-off forced companies to compromise between creating value from complexity and benefiting from the efficiencies of simplicity. As businesses entered new geographies, developed new products, opened new channels and added more granular customer segments, they made their offerings more complex with the intention of adding value. But, as an almost inevitable consequence, companies also made it more difficult for customers to interact with the company and more unwieldy for employees to get things done. However, with today´s increased digitization, companies can finesse this trade-off; they can increase valueadding complexity in their product offerings while keeping processes for customers and employees simple. Our research suggests that companies operating in this "complexity sweet spot" outperform their competitors on profitability. In this article, we explain how companies achieve this breakthrough in the digital world.
The MIT Center for Information Systems Research surveyed 255 executives in 2015 to investigate how companies are managing business complexity. This report details the findings from our analysis of the survey data:
1. Some product complexity adds value, some does not. Specifically, companies with more links (aka integration) in their product and service portfolio are higher performing. - 2. Product variety makes it more difficult for costumers and employees to get things done. These customers and employee difficulties impair a company's performance. - 3. Companies that excel at making it easy for employees and customers to get things done differentiate themselves by applying a set of complexity management practices around enterprise architecture, role reconfiguration, and the use of metrics and incentive systems.
Based on these findings, we recommend that companies make product complexity a strategic chois, invest in the abovementioned complexity management practices, and use costumer and employee dfficulties as key metrics for product innovation.
In its 100+ years of company history, IBM reinvented itself multiple times. In the last 20 years, IBM had shifted from individual products to integrated solutions and moved to become a globally integrated enterprise with standardized processes. In 2014, the expanding adoption of social, mobile, analytics, and cloud (SMAC) technologies generated excitement in the industry. IBM believed these technologies presented a huge growth opportunity. Simultaneously, management viewed SMAC technologies as disruptive forces demanding transformative changes to how IBM worked. And introducing new ways of working to 400,000 employees in 175 countries was a daunting task.
Based on personal interviews with 17 IBM business and IT executives, the case illustrates organizational challenges of introducing current technologies that even providers of these technologies face – in other words, when they “eat their own cooking.” It demonstrates the difficulties large companies face when implementing technologies that students use daily and take for granted.
By integrating its previously separate insurance, banking and investment products around customer life events (e.g., buying a car, getting married or buying a house), USAA is able to deliver a superior customer experience. To achieve the integration, USAA had to re-architect its business by redesigning structures, roles, incentives, processes and IT systems. The USAA case provides four principles for architecting a business to provide superior customer experience, which will become increasingly important in the digital economy.