Refine
Document Type
- Journal article (422)
- Conference proceeding (143)
- Book chapter (89)
- Working Paper (23)
- Doctoral Thesis (7)
- Book (5)
- Review (5)
- Anthology (2)
- Patent / Standard / Guidelines (1)
- Report (1)
Has full text
- yes (698) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (698)
Institute
- ESB Business School (698) (remove)
Publisher
- Springer (100)
- Elsevier (85)
- Hochschule Reutlingen (30)
- MDPI (24)
- MIM, Marken-Institut München (24)
- IEEE (19)
- Association for Information Systems (16)
- MIT Center for Information Systems Research (16)
- Wiley (16)
- Thexis Verlag (13)
This article studies the effects of reverse factoring in a supply chain when the buyer company facilitates its lower short-term borrowing rates to the supplier corporation in return for extended payment terms. We explore the role of interest rate changes, rating changes, and the business cycle position on the cost and benefit trade-off from a supplier perspective. We utilize a combined empirical approach consisting of an event study in Step 1 and a simulation model in Step 2. The event study identifies the quantitative magnitude of central bank decisions and rating changes on the interest rate differential. The simulation computes with a rolling-window methodology the daily cost and benefits of reverse factoring from 2010 to 2018 under the assumption of the efficient market hypothesis. Our major finding is that changes of crucial financial variables such as interest rates, ratings, or news alerts will turn former win-win into win-lose situations for the supplier contingent to the business cycle. Overall, our results exhibit sophisticated trade-offs under reverse factoring and consequently require a careful evaluation in managerial decisions.
In today’s marketplace, the consumption of luxury goods is at a peak due to increasing global wealth and low interest rates, resulting in a vast supply of goods and services to which customer experiences are more relevant than ever before. One of the most recent developments in this field shows that consumers no longer simply purchase a product or service based on the fact sheet; they are also interested in the experience around the product. Successful brands must develop and maintain individual images to sustain their competitive advantage and build brand equity that is beneficial for customers and firms. Ideally, these will lead to satisfaction and loyalty between a brand, its products, and its customers. Existing research about brand experience and brand equity has mainly focused on functional aspects, which seem to differ for high-value luxury goods. Most studies have focused on industries like retail and fashion brands, sampling university students or visitors to shopping malls, and some have even mixed different types of industries together. This underpins the need for research within a single luxury industry with actual luxury customers who have a solid background with brand experiences.
The purpose of this study was to explore the brand experience spectrum within the automotive industry in Germany, particularly in the affordable luxury sport car sector. Identifying the factors and components that constitute, influence, or leverage/drive a brand experience from their perspective was a clear aim of the study. To achieve this, the study collected data from indepth interviews with German (n=60) respondents who had experience with affordable and luxury sport cars. The conceptual framework was based on two empirically tested models guiding this exploratory consumer research. The first model to build on was the consumerbased brand equity model, empirically tested by Çifci et al. (2016) and Nam et al. (2011). The second conceptual framework was Lemon and Verhoef’s (2016) customer journey model consisting of relevant touchpoints along the following three stages: pre-purchase, purchase, and post-purchase.
The findings of the research demonstrate that, although the six brand equity concepts – brand awareness, physical quality, staff behaviour, self-congruence, brand identification, and lifestyle – are broadly applicable in understanding customer experience in the affordable luxury car industry, the content of these dimensions differs from that suggested by the previous authors. The research established that cognitive and affective (or symbolic) components build the foundation of customer brand experience and supports Çifci et al.’s (2016) and Nam et al.’s (2011) study results. The study also identified brand trust as an important and highly relevant concept for customer brand experience in the luxury automotive car industry. Brand trust influences customer satisfaction and loyalty, therefore improving and complementing the existing model. Furthermore, the study confirmed Lemon and Verhoef’s (2016) process model of the customer journey and experience; however, it suggested two different customer journeys depending on the customers’ previous experience (first-time and experienced buyers). The differences between the two groups and the relevance of the journey touchpoints within the three purchase stages vary significantly in terms and are distinct. Identified key touchpoints for both groups are the contact to a dealer as well as information gathering online. Differences have been found in the length of purchase stages and across the customer journey. The study highlights the importance of trust, identification, and product quality for customer brand experience. Moreover, the findings of this study complement the brand equity model of Çifci et al. (2016) by adding the new concept of trust, which is highly relevant. The current knowledge is complemented by a new understanding and mapping of the customer journey for luxury sports cars in Germany. This study can assist practitioners and managers by providing a compass indicating which touchpoints are relevant to which customer group. Social value can be achieved by encouraging interactions between brand and consumer (e.g. central product launch events) and through brand-oriented interactions among consumers (e.g. dealer events, clubs, or communities). Customers are motivated to express their distinctiveness through product experience and brand identification (belonging/distinction) and to develop a loyal link to brands.
Die digitale Arbeitswelt in ihrer Mehrdimensionalität verstehen: Digitalisierungsatlas und -index
(2021)
Die digitale Transformation der Arbeitswelt ist deshalb so herausfordernd, da die Arbeitswelt für sich bereits ein komplexes mehrdimensionales System ist, das sich kaum überblicken lässt. Für Unternehmen ist es deshalb wichtig, die Mehrdimensionalität und Komplexität der digitalen Arbeitswelt zu verstehen, hierfür ein gemeinsames Sprachspiel zu entwickeln und auf dieser Basis eine gemeinsame Einschätzung des Status quo der eigenen Arbeitswelt zu beschreiben. Mithilfe von zwei Instrumenten, dem Digitalisierungsatlas und dem Digitalisierungsindex, kann dies gelingen. In diesem Beitrag werden diese Instrumente im Detail dargestellt und es wird erklärt, wie sie Organisationen dabei helfen, zu beschreiben und zu verstehen, wo sie selbst in der digitalen Transformation der Arbeitswelt stehen.
Wenn Unternehmen den Schritt in die digitale Arbeitswelt gehen wollen, stehen sie vor der Herausforderung, konkrete Vorstellungen, Ziele und Maßnahmen zu entwickeln und umzusetzen. Häufig fehlt es Unternehmen an Wissen, ihre Transformation der Arbeitswelt strategisch zu gestalten und zu planen. Das Projekt DigiTraIn 4.0 setzt hier an und bietet mit dem Digitalisierungskompass ein Instrument, welches Unternehmen dabei unterstützt, eine Vision und spezifische Ziele für die Digitalisierung ihrer eigenen Arbeitswelt zu entwickeln. Im Anschluss daran unterstützt die Transformationsagenda Unternehmen dabei, konkrete Handlungsmaßnahmen zu entwickeln und deren Ablauf zu planen.
Arbeitswelten strategisch entwicklen: mit den DigiTraIn-Instrumenten zur digitalen Transformation
(2021)
Der Weg in die digitale Arbeitswelt ist für viele Unternehmen eine herausfordernde und komplexe Transformation. Um diesen Weg erfolgreich zu beschreiten, benötigen Unternehmen funktionierende Managementinstrumente. Im Projekt DigiTraIn 4.0 wurden vier Instrumente für eine gelingende Transformation in das digitale Arbeiten entwickelt und in der Unternehmenspraxis erprobt. Diese Instrumente werden im vorliegenden Beitrag, ausgehend von der Zielsetzung des Projekts, einführend dargestellt. Zudem wird ein Überblick über die weiteren Beiträge in diesem Buch gegeben, in denen die Instrumente im Detail erläutert werden und spezifische Aspekte des Wandels in die digitale Arbeitswelt im Fokus stehen.
Autonomisierung von Shopfloor Management : Der Weg vom analogen zum autonomen Shopfloor Management
(2021)
Neue Technologien der Digitalisierung, Vernetzung und künstlichen Intelligenz werden zunehmend auch im Shopfloor Management (SFM) Einzug halten. Dieser Beitrag beschreibt in vier Stufen, wie sich das klassische SFM über das digitale SFM hin zu einem smarten und autonomen SFM entwickeln könnte. Darauf aufbauend wird diskutiert, welche Auswirkungen der Einsatz dieser neuen Technologien auf die operative Gestaltung der Durchführung eines SFM hätte und welche Konsequenzen somit auf Mitarbeiter und Führungskräfte zukommen würden.*)
Reacting to ever-changing business environments, in the last decade complex systems of systems accomplished giant leaps forward leading to great technological flexibility. However, this dimension of flexibility is often limited by the rigidity of super-ordinated planning systems. Especially when hybrid teams of automated and human resources are in place, the dynamic assignment of tasks taking into account ergonomics remains a challenge. After exposing a gap in the state of the art on the topic, this paper presents an approach to include ergonomics in dynamic resource allocation models. Combining and complementing existing approaches, the presented method monitors the actual ergonomic burden of the resources during a shift and it provides a linear optimization model to steer the resource allocation process.
Experimentelle Organisationsentwicklung : Perspektiven eines zukunftsfähigen Veränderungsansatzes
(2021)
Die Organisationsentwicklung selbst verändert sich und wird “zukunftsoffener”. In diesem Beitrag argumentieren die Autoren, dass die Idee des Experimentierens als zukunftsfähige Veränderungsmethode angewandt werden kann. Sie stellen zentrale Prämissen einer "experimentellen Organisationsentwicklung" und zeigen die Eckpunkte eines spezifischen Interventionsdesigns auf.
Kontrolle bei New Collaboration Work: Über die Fantasien von Purpose, Wachstum und Zugehörigkeit
(2021)
Derzeit geht es in vielen Unternehmen darum, Zusammenarbeit zukunftsfähig zu gestalten: Hierarchien werden flacher, Teams stärker selbstorganisiert, und Prozesse wie agile Frameworks regeln die Abläufe.
Was aber passiert in solchen kollaborativen Arbeitskontexten, wenn es um Kontrolle geht? In hierarchischen Organisationen ist das Thema vergleichsweise einfach zu greifen: Führungskräfte kontrollieren Arbeitsprozesse über Arbeitsteilung und -zuweisung, über disziplinarische Hoheit und motivierendes Führungsverhalten (Mitarbeitergespräche, Kritik, Lob).
This study determines the correlation between industry-specific success patterns of Germany’s engineering industry and the business models applied within. In order to identify this correlation, the following objectives are addressed within the framework of this paper: (1) identification and description of business models used by Germany’s engineering industry; (2) analysis of industry-specific success patterns of Germany’s engineering industry by the usage of Key-Performance-Indicators (KPIs); and (3) determination of correlation between the KPIs and Germany’s engineering industry’s business models’ effectiveness. These objectives are mainly achieved by literature research and expert surveys. The findings highlight the KPIs (overall 41) that are relevant for the respective business models. This enables a better understanding of the interrelationships of the business model, in order to derive relevant conclusions. The paper contributes to the literature as it advances this field of research in Germany, and it is one of the first studies to examine the relationship between business models and industry-specific success patterns with relevant KPIs.