Refine
Document Type
Language
- English (4)
Has full text
- yes (4)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (4)
Institute
- Technik (4)
Publisher
- ACM (4) (remove)
There is still a great reliance on human expert knowledge during the analog integrated circuit sizing design phase due to its complexity and scale, with the result that there is a very low level of automation associated with it. Current research shows that reinforcement learning is a promising approach for addressing this issue. Similarly, it has been shown that the convergence of conventional optimization approaches can be improved by transforming the design space from the geometrical domain into the electrical domain. Here, this design space transformation is employed as an alternative action space for deep reinforcement learning agents. The presented approach is based entirely on reinforcement learning, whereby agents are trained in the craft of analog circuit sizing without explicit expert guidance. After training and evaluating agents on circuits of varying complexity, their behavior when confronted with a different technology, is examined, showing the applicability, feasibility as well as transferability of this approach.
Physical analog IC design has not been automated to the same degree as digital IC design. This shortfall is primarily rooted in the analog IC design problem itself, which is considerably more complex even for small problem sizes. Significant progress has been made in analog automation in several R&D target areas in recent years. Constraint engineering and generator-based module approaches are among the innovations that have emerged. Our paper will first present a brief review of the state of the art of analog layout automation. We will then introduce active and open research areas and present two visions – a “continuous layout design flow” and a “bottom-up meets top-down design flow” – which could significantly push analog design automation towards its goal of analog synthesis.
Electromigration (EM) is becoming a progressively severe reliability challenge due to increased interconnect current densities. A shift from traditional (post-layout) EM verification to robust (pro-active) EM aware design - where the circuit layout is designed with individual EM-robust solutions - is urgently needed. This tutorial will give an overview of EM and its effects on the reliability of present and future integrated circuits (ICs). We introduce the physical EM process and present its specific characteristics that can be affected during physical design. Examples of EM countermeasures which are applied in today’s commercial design flows are presented. We show how to improve the EM-robustness of metallization patterns and we also consider mission proiles to obtain application-oriented current density limits. The increasing interaction of EM with thermal migration is investigated as well. We conclude with a discussion of application examples to shift from the current post layout EM verification towards an EM aware physical design process. Its methodologies, such as EM-aware routing, increase the EM-robustness of the layout with the overall goal of reducing the negative impact of EM on the circuit’s reliability.
The vast majority of state-of-the-art integrated circuits are mixed-signal chips. While the design of the digital parts of the ICs is highly automated, the design of the analog circuitry is largely done manually; it is very time-consuming; and prone to error. Among the reasons generally listed for this is often the attitude of the analog designer. The fact is that many analog designers are convinced that human experience and intuition are needed for good analog design. This is why they distrust the automated synthesis tools. This observation is quite correct, but this is only a symptom of the real problem. This paper shows that this phenomenon is caused by very concrete technical (and thus very rational) issues. These issues lie in the mode of operation of the typical optimization processes employed for the synthesizing tasks. I will show that the dilemma that arises in analog design with these optimizers is the root cause of the low level of automation in analog design. The paper concludes with a review of proposals for automating analog design