Refine
Document Type
- Conference proceeding (18)
- Journal article (3)
- Book chapter (3)
Language
- English (24)
Has full text
- yes (24)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (24)
Institute
- Informatik (24)
Publisher
Even though near-data processing (NDP) can provably reduce data transfers and increase performance, current NDP is solely utilized in read-only settings. Slow or tedious to implement synchronization and invalidation mechanisms between host and smart storage make NDP support for data-intensive update operations difficult. In this paper, we introduce a low-latency cache-coherent shared lock table for update NDP settings in disaggregated memory environments. It utilizes the novel CCIX interconnect technology and is integrated in neoDBMS, a near-data processing DBMS for smart storage. Our evaluation indicates end-to-end lock latencies of ∼80-100ns and robust performance under contention.
Multi-versioning and MVCC are the foundations of many modern DBMSs. Under mixed workloads and large datasets, the creation of the transactional snapshot can become very expensive, as long-running analytical transactions may request old versions, residing on cold storage, for reasons of transactional consistency. Furthermore, analytical queries operate on cold data, stored on slow persistent storage. Due to the poor data locality, snapshot creation may cause massive data transfers and thus lower performance. Given the current trend towards computational storage and near-data processing, it has become viable to perform such operations in-storage to reduce data transfers and improve scalability. neoDBMS is a DBMS designed for near-data processing and computational storage. In this paper, we demonstrate how neoDBMS performs snapshot computation in-situ. We showcase different interactive scenarios, where neoDBMS outperforms PostgreSQL 12 by up to 5×.
Real Time Charging (RTC) applications that reside in the telecommunications domain have the need for extremely fast database transactions. Today´s providers rely mostly on in-memory databases for this kind of information processing. A flexible and modular benchmark suite specifically designed for this domain provides a valuable framework to test the performance of different DB candidates. Besides a data and a load generator, the suite also includes decoupled database connectors and use case components for convenient customization and extension. Such easily produced test results can be used as guidance for choosing a subset of candidates for further tuning/testing and finally evaluating the database most suited to the chosen use cases. This is why our benchmark suite can be of value for choosing databases for RTC use cases.
We introduce IPA-IDX – an approach to handle index modifications modern storage technologies (NVM, Flash) as physical in-place appends, using simplified physiological log records. IPA-IDX provides similar performance and longevity advantages for indexes as basic IPA [5] does for tables. The selective application of IPA-IDX and basic IPA to certain regions and objects, lowers the GC overhead by over 60%, while keeping the total space overhead to 2%. The combined effect of IPA and IPA-IDX increases performance by 28%.
Many modern DBMS architectures require transferring data from storage to process it afterwards. Given the continuously increasing amounts of data, data transfers quickly become a scalability limiting factor. Near-Data Processing and smart/computational storage emerge as promising trends allowing for decoupled in-situ operation execution, data transfer reduction and better bandwidth utilization. However, not every operation is suitable for an in-situ execution and a careful placement and optimization is needed.
In this paper we present an NDP-aware cost model. It has been implemented in MySQL and evaluated with nKV. We make several observations underscoring the need for optimization.
In the present tutorial we perform a cross-cut analysis of database storage management from the perspective of modern storage technologies. We argue that neither the design of modern DBMS, nor the architecture of modern storage technologies are aligned with each other. Moreover, the majority of the systems rely on a complex multi-layer and compatibility oriented storage stack. The result is needlessly suboptimal DBMS performance, inefficient utilization, or significant write amplification due to outdated abstractions and interfaces. In the present tutorial we focus on the concept of native storage, which is storage operated without intermediate abstraction layers over an open native storage interface and is directly controlled by the DBMS.
A transaction is a demarcated sequence of application operations, for which the following properties are guaranteed by the underlying transaction processing system (TPS): atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability (ACID). Transactions are therefore a general abstraction, provided by TPS that simplifies application development by relieving transactional applications from the burden of concurrency and failure handling. Apart from the ACID properties, a TPS must guarantee high and robust performance (high transactional throughput and low response times), high reliability (no data loss, ability to recover last consistent state, fault tolerance), and high availability (infrequent outages, short recovery times).
The architectures and workhorse algorithms of a high-performance TPS are built around the properties of the underlying hardware. The introduction of nonvolatile memories (NVM) as novel storage technology opens an entire new problem space, with the need to revise aspects such as the virtual memory hierarchy, storage management and data placement, access paths, and indexing. NVM are also referred to as storage-class memory (SCM).
Active storage
(2018)
In brief, Active Storage refers to an architectural hardware and software paradigm, based on collocation storage and compute units. Ideally, it will allow to execute application-defined data ... within the physical data storage. Thus Active Storage seeks to minimize expensive data movement, improving performance, scalability, and resource efficiency. The effective use of Active Storage mandates new architectures, algorithms, interfaces, and development toolchains.
Modern mixed (HTAP)workloads execute fast update-transactions and long running analytical queries on the same dataset and system. In multi-version (MVCC) systems, such workloads result in many short-lived versions and long version-chains as well as in increased and frequent maintenance overhead.
Consequently, the index pressure increases significantly. Firstly, the frequent modifications cause frequent creation of new versions, yielding a surge in index maintenance overhead. Secondly and more importantly, index-scans incur extra I/O overhead to determine, which of the resulting tuple versions are visible to the executing transaction (visibility-check) as current designs only store version/timestamp information in the base table – not in the index. Such index-only visibility-check is critical for HTAP workloads on large datasets.
In this paper we propose the Multi Version Partitioned B-Tree (MV-PBT) as a version-aware index structure, supporting index-only visibility checks and flash-friendly I/O patterns. The experimental evaluation indicates a 2x improvement for analytical queries and 15% higher transactional throughput under HTAP workloads. MV-PBT offers 40% higher tx. throughput compared to WiredTiger’s LSM-Tree implementation under YCSB.
Database Management Systems (DBMS) need to handle large updatable datasets in on-line transaction processing (OLTP) workloads. Most modern DBMS provide snapshots of data in multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) transaction management scheme. Each transaction operates on a snapshot of the database, which is calculated from a set of tuple versions. High parallelism and resource-efficient append-only data placement on secondary storage is enabled. One major issue in indexing tuple versions on modern hardware technologies is the high write amplification for tree-indexes.
Partitioned B-Trees (PBT) [5] is based on the structure of the ubiquitous B+ Tree [8]. They achieve a near optimal write amplification and beneficial sequential writes on secondary storage. Yet they have not been implemented in a MVCC enabled DBMS to date.
In this paper we present the implementation of PBTs in PostgreSQL extended with SIAS. Compared to PostgreSQL’s B+–Trees PBTs have 50% better transaction throughput under TPC-C and a 30% improvement to standard PostgreSQL with Heap-Only Tuples.