Refine
Year of publication
- 2022 (3) (remove)
Document Type
Language
- English (3)
Has full text
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (3)
Institute
- Technik (3)
There is still a great reliance on human expert knowledge during the analog integrated circuit sizing design phase due to its complexity and scale, with the result that there is a very low level of automation associated with it. Current research shows that reinforcement learning is a promising approach for addressing this issue. Similarly, it has been shown that the convergence of conventional optimization approaches can be improved by transforming the design space from the geometrical domain into the electrical domain. Here, this design space transformation is employed as an alternative action space for deep reinforcement learning agents. The presented approach is based entirely on reinforcement learning, whereby agents are trained in the craft of analog circuit sizing without explicit expert guidance. After training and evaluating agents on circuits of varying complexity, their behavior when confronted with a different technology, is examined, showing the applicability, feasibility as well as transferability of this approach.
This paper presents a toolbox in Matlab/Octave for procedural design of analog integrated circuits. The toolbox contains all native functions required by analog designers (namely, schematic-generation, simulation setup and execution, integrated look-up tables and functions for design space exploration) to capture an entire design strategy in an executable script. This script - which we call an Expert Design Plan (EDP) - is capable of executing an analog circuit design fully automatically. The toolbox is integrated in an existing design flow. A bandgap reference voltage circuit is designed with this tool in less than 15 min.
The vast majority of state-of-the-art integrated circuits are mixed-signal chips. While the design of the digital parts of the ICs is highly automated, the design of the analog circuitry is largely done manually; it is very time-consuming; and prone to error. Among the reasons generally listed for this is often the attitude of the analog designer. The fact is that many analog designers are convinced that human experience and intuition are needed for good analog design. This is why they distrust the automated synthesis tools. This observation is quite correct, but this is only a symptom of the real problem. This paper shows that this phenomenon is caused by very concrete technical (and thus very rational) issues. These issues lie in the mode of operation of the typical optimization processes employed for the synthesizing tasks. I will show that the dilemma that arises in analog design with these optimizers is the root cause of the low level of automation in analog design. The paper concludes with a review of proposals for automating analog design