Refine
Document Type
Language
- English (2)
Has full text
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (2)
Institute
- ESB Business School (1)
- Informatik (1)
Publisher
- Universität Trier (2) (remove)
Competing logics in evaluating employee performance : building compromises through conventions
(2015)
Current research argues that competing institutional logistics1 can co-exist enduringly and investigates how organizations cope with such institutional complexity (Greenwood et al. 2011). Thereby, the role of practices for handling competing logics has been overlooked and it is currently only to limited extent understood how organizations establish compromises between competing logics. Therefore, we investigated the recent performance appraisal reform of a German public sector organization that occurred in 2008 (see also Kozica, Brandl 2015). BAND (the pseudonym for our organization) has been using performance appraisals for several decades, and performance appraisals have already become entrenched instruments (Zeitz, Mittal, McAulay 1999) for handling staff promotion decisions. While BAND accepted the accountability logic of the performance appraisal, the professional logic (which is based on trust and comradeship as a high value of being professional in our organization) is accepted too and BAND has established a fine-grained compromise between the different logics. During the recent reform of the performance appraisal system, however, this compromise has broken up and challenged organizational members to (re-)arrange a compromise. By using French convention school of thinking (Boltanski, Thévenot 2006) we address how BAND copes with conflicting logics by forming compromises in organizational practices. Thereby, we show that the concept of convention is particularly promising for understanding of how organizations deal with institutional complexity. More broadly, our argument contributes to the elaboration of an organizational theory for the institutional logics discussion that explains how organizational and individual actions are interlinked.
Asymmetric read/write storage technologies such as Flash are becoming
a dominant trend in modern database systems. They introduce
hardware characteristics and properties which are fundamentally
different from those of traditional storage technologies such
as HDDs.
Multi-Versioning Database Management Systems (MV-DBMSs)
and Log-based Storage Managers (LbSMs) are concepts that can
effectively address the properties of these storage technologies but
are designed for the characteristics of legacy hardware. A critical
component of MV-DBMSs is the invalidation model: commonly,
transactional timestamps are assigned to the old and the new version,
resulting in two independent (physical) update operations.
Those entail multiple random writes as well as in-place updates,
sub-optimal for new storage technologies both in terms of performance
and endurance. Traditional page-append LbSM approaches
alleviate random writes and immediate in-place updates, hence reducing
the negative impact of Flash read/write asymmetry. Nevertheless,
they entail significant mapping overhead, leading to write
amplification.
In this work we present an approach called Snapshot Isolation
Append Storage Chains (SIAS-Chains) that employs a combination
of multi-versioning, append storage management in tuple granularity
and novel singly-linked (chain-like) version organization.
SIAS-Chains features: simplified buffer management, multi-version
indexing and introduces read/write optimizations to data placement
on modern storage media. SIAS-Chains algorithmically avoids
small in-place updates, caused by in-place invalidation and converts
them into appends. Every modification operation is executed
as an append and recently inserted tuple versions are co-located.