Refine
Document Type
- Journal article (21)
- Conference proceeding (11)
- Working Paper (4)
Has full text
- yes (36) (remove)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (36)
Institute
- ESB Business School (36) (remove)
Successful digital business strategies rely less on strategic analysis and big bets than on experiments and learning. Consider, for example, that Airbnb grew out of the belief that people would pay to sleep on air mattress on a stranger's floor. Similarly, Instagram started as an app for checking in and hanging out with friends (and sharing pictures) that proved complicated to use. Twitter's founders had first tried a podcasting platform, Odeo, which Apple made obsolete with iTunes. AUDI AG had to kill of its "share a car with five friends" app before rolling out more successful mobility services in a number of countries. The digital successes did not grow out of a comprehensive upfront analysis. Digital strategy emerges from an idea - often, not a particularly good idea.
Royal Philip's goal was to use innovation to improve the lives of three billion people a year by 2025. To reach that goal, the company was shifting from selling medical products in a transactional manner to providing integrated healthcare solutions based on digital health technology ("HealthTech").
This shift required a dual transformation. On one hand, the company needed to transform how healthcare was conducted. Healthcare professionals would have to change the way they worked and reimbursement schemes needed to change to incentivize payers, providers, and patients in vastly different ways. On the other hand, Philips needed to redesign how it worked internally. The company componentized its business, introduced digital platforms, and co-created solutions with the various stakeholders of the healthcare industry.
In other words: Royal Philips was transforming itself in order to reinvent healthcare in the digital age.
In 2016, German car manufacturer the Audi Group (AUDI AG) was working on an expanding array of digital innovations. The goals of these innovations varied, and included strengthening customer- and employee-facing processes, digitally enhancing existing products, and developing new, potentially disruptive business models. Audi’s IT unit was critical to each of these efforts. Based on personal interviews with 11 IT- and non-IT executives at Audi, this case examines the different ways in which digitization can help to enhance and transform an organization’s processes, products, and business models. The case also highlights the challenges that arise as large companies “digitize.”
Recent digital technologies like the Internet of Things and Augmented Reality have brought IT into companies’ core products. What were previously purely physical products are becoming hybrid or digitized. Despite receiving a lot of recent attention, digitized products have only seen a slow uptake in businesses so far. In this paper, we study the challenges that keep companies from realizing the desired impacts of digitized products and the practices they employ to address these challenges. To do so, we looked at companies from a set of industries that are highly affected by digital transformation, but at the same time hesitant to move to a more digitized world: the creative industries. Based on a literature review and twelve interviews in creative industries, we developed a conceptual model that can serve as a basis for formulating testable hypotheses for further research in this area.
AUDI AG has historically focused on producing and selling premium vehicles but has begun to experiment with providing mobility services, built around car sharing. Its response to the so-called sharing economy addressed strategic and transformational challenges. Strategically, the company pursued additional sources of revenue from targeted, premium mobility services, rather than the less segmented services provided by competitors such as BMW and Zipcar. AUDI AG also transformed its organizational structure, processes and architecture to balance autonomy for innovation and integration for competitiveness.
Im Projekt wurden die wirtschaftliche Bedeutung und der Nutzen digital physischer Produkte in der Kreativwirtschaft untersucht, sowie sich bei der Herstellung digital-physischer Produkte ergebende Herausforderungen und Praktiken zu deren Überwindung. Hierzu wurden eine Literaturrecherche, qualitative Interviews und eine Umfrage durchgeführt. Abschließend wurden einzelne Firmen der Kreativwirtschaft fallstudienhaft untersucht.
Die Ergebnisse haben wir zu folgenden Kernbotschaften verdichtet:
Digital-physische Produkte sind derzeit noch nicht sehr weit verbreitet in der Kreativwirtschaft und nur wenige Firmen sind bereits an deren Erstellung beteiligt.
Für Firmen der Kreativwirtschaft, die bereits digital-physische Produkte herstellen, haben solche Produkte bisher eine geringe wirtschaftliche Bedeutung. Dagegen wird die strategische Bedeutung schon heute als hoch eingeschätzt und Firmen erwarten durchschnittlich eine Verdopplung der wirtschaftlichen Bedeutung (Anteil am Umsatz >50%) in den nächsten drei Jahren.
Firmen, die ihre digital-physischen Produkte als erfolgreich einschätzen, geben an, sich stark auf das physische Produkt zu fokussieren: Synergien werden zwischen physischen und digitalen Angeboten geschaffen, physische Produkte werden durch digitale Komponenten attraktiver gestaltet und die digitale Anreichung physischer Produkte dient als Marketing-Tool. Firmen geben an, dass dies zu einer Steigerung des Absatzes und der Zufriedenheit bestehender Kunden des bisher rein physischen Produktes führt.
To deliver on a digital value proposition, companies must fundamentally re-architect. In other words, they must redesign their processes, systems, roles, data, and habits to allow them to iteratively create, enhance, an replace digital offerings. This briefing examines how Royal Philips is transforming its value proposition - and its entire company - to seize the opportunities presented by digital technologies.
IT platforms as the foundation of digitized processes and products are vital in a digital economy. However, many companies’ platforms are liabilities, not strategic assets because of their complexity. Consequently, companies initiate IT complexity reduction programs. But these technology-centric programs at best provide temporary relief. Soon after, companies’ platforms become just as complex as before. Based on four case studies, we identify three non-technical drivers of platform complexity: (1) Lacking awareness of consequences business decisions have on platform complexity, (2) Lacking motivation to avoid platform complexity, (3) Lacking authority to protect platforms from complexity. We propose measures to address these drivers that can help achieve more sustainable impact on platform complexity: (1) Removing information asymmetries between those creating complexity and those dealing with complexity, (2) Redefining incentives to include long-term effects on platform complexity, (3) Redressing power imbalances between those who create complexity and those who have to manage it.
New digital technologies present both game-changing opportunities for—and existential threats to—companies whose success was built in the pre-digital economy. This article describes our findings from a study of 25 companies that were embarking on digital transformation journeys. We identified two digital strategies—customer engagement and digitized solutions—that provide direction for a digital transformation. Two technology-enabled assets are essential for executing those strategies: an operational backbone and a digital services platform. We describe how a big old company can combine these elements to navigate its digital transformation.