Open Access

Benjamin SackmannORCiD, Michael LauxmannORCiD, Dmitrii Burovikhin

• Simulation models of the middle ear have rarely been used for diagnostic purposes due to their limited predictive ability with respect to pathologies. One big challenge is the large uncertainty and ambiguity in the choice of material parameters of the model. Typically, the model parameters are determined by fitting simulation results to validation measurements. In a previous study, it was shown that fitting the model parameters of a finite-element model using the middle-ear transfer function and various other measurable output variables from normal ears alone is not sufficient to obtain a good predictive ability of the model on pathological middle-ear conditions. However, the inclusion of validation measurements on one pathological case resulted in a very good predictive ability also for other pathological cases. Although the found parameter set was plausible in all aspects, it was not yet possible to draw conclusions about the uniqueness and the accuracy or the uncertainty of the parameter set. To answer these questions, statistical solution approaches are used in this study. Using the Monte Carlo method, a large number of plausible model data sets are generated that correctly represent the normal and pathological middle-ear characteristics in terms of various output variables like e.g., impedance, reflectance, umbo, and stapes transfer function. Subsequent principal component analyses (PCA) allow to draw conclusions about correlations, quantitative limits and statistical density of parameter values. Furthermore, applying inverse PCA yields numerous plausible parameterizations of the middle-ear model, which can be used for data augmentation and training of a neural network which is capable of distinguishing between a normal middle ear and pathologies like otosclerosis, malleus fixation, and disarticulation based on objectively measured quantities like impedance, reflectance, and umbo velocity.