Informatik
Refine
Document Type
- Conference proceeding (33)
- Book chapter (7)
- Journal article (5)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Is part of the Bibliography
- yes (46)
Institute
- Informatik (46)
Publisher
- Springer (19)
- Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V (8)
- IEEE (7)
- RWTH Aachen (5)
- Riga Technical University Press (4)
- Elsevier (1)
- SciTePress (1)
EAM ist ein holistischer Ansatz, um komplexe IT- und Unternehmensstrukturen darzustellen. Dabei ist es von zentraler Bedeutung, diese Strukturen möglichst komplett und übersichtlich zu visualisieren. Ein Ansatz, dies zu erreichen, ist eine multiperspektivische Darstellung von mehreren Views in einem Architekturcockpit. Dabei können mehrere Views simultan betrachtet und analysiert werden. Dadurch ist es möglich, die Auswirkungen einer Analyse des Views eines Stakeholders simultan aus den Views anderer Stakeholder betrachten zu können, um eventuelle Wechselwirkungen zu erkennen und einen allgemeinen Überblick über die Unternehmensarchitektur zu behalten. In dieser Arbeit zeigen wir, von der Konzeption über die Umsetzung bis zu einem Anwendungsbeispiel, wie ein solches Architekturcockpit realisiert werden kann.
A configuration-management-database driven approach for fabric-process specification and automation
(2014)
In this paper we describe an approach that integrates a Configuration- Management-Database into fabric-process specification and automation in order to consider different conditions regarding to cloud-services. By implementing our approach, the complexity of fabric processes gets reduced. We developed a prototype by using formal prototyping principles as research methods and integrated the Configuration-Management-Database Command into the Workflow- Management-System Activiti. We used this prototype to evaluate our approach. We implemented three different fabric-processes and show that by using our approach the complexity of these three fabric-processes gets reduced.
Due to digitalization, constant technological progress and ever shorter product life cycles, enterprises are currently facing major challenges. In order to succeed in the market, business models have to be adapted more often and more quickly to changing market conditions than they used to be. Fast adaptability, also called agility, is a decisive competitive factor in today’s world. Because of the ever-growing IT part of products and the fact that they are manufactured using IT, changing the business model has a major impact on the enterprise architecture (EA). However, developing EAs is a very complex task, because many stakeholders with conflicting interests are involved in the decision-making process. Therefore, a lot of collaboration is required. To support organizations in developing their EA, this article introduces a novel integrative method that systematically integrates stakeholder interests into decision-making activities. By using the method, collaboration between stakeholders involved is improved by identifying points of contact between them. Furthermore, standardized activities make decision-making more transparent and comparable without limiting creativity.
Unternehmen stehen aktuell aufgrund der Digitalisierung, des stetigen technologischen Fortschritts und immer kürzer werdenden Produktlebenszyklen vor großen Herausforderungen. Um am Markt bestehen zu können, müssen Geschäftsmodelle öfter und schneller an sich verändernde Marktverhältnisse angepasst werden als dies früher der Fall war. Eine schnelle Anpassungsfähigkeit, auch Agilität genannt, ist in der heutigen Zeit ein entscheidender Wettbewerbsfaktor. Aufgrund des stetig wachsenden IT Anteils in Produkten sowie der Tatsache, dass diese IT-gestützt hergestellt werden, haben Änderungen des Geschäftsmodells große Auswirkungen auf die Unternehmensarchitektur eines Unternehmens.
Eine Unternehmensarchitektur umspannt das Unternehmen, indem diese die fachlichen und technischen Strukturen, insbesondere die gesamte IT, des Unternehmens beinhaltet und integriert. Das Management der Unternehmensarchitektur ist die Disziplin zur Beherrschung und Abstimmung dieser Strukturen. An der Gestaltung der Unternehmensarchitektur wirken viele Stakeholder mit individuellen und teils gegensätzlichen Interessen aus den unterschiedlichsten Bereichen des Unternehmens mit. Dies macht die Entscheidungsfindung zu einer komplexen Aufgabe.
Die in dieser Arbeit entworfene integrative Methode für die Entscheidungsfindung hat das Ziel, die Betroffenen und Beteiligten, im Folgenden Stakeholder, bei ihren Entscheidungen zu unterstützen. Die Grundidee hierbei ist die systematische Einbeziehung der Interessen der Stakeholder und davon abgeleiteter Visualisierungen. Dies verleiht der Methode ihren integrativen Charakter und hilft Abhängigkeiten zwischen Stakeholdern zu erkennen. Dadurch wird die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den an Entscheidungen beteiligten Stakeholdern gefördert. Neben der systematischen Einbeziehung von Visualisierungen wird im Rahmen dieser Arbeit das Konzept der Technik eingeführt. Techniken werden ebenfalls von den Interessen der Stakeholder abgeleitet und dienen der Unterstützung bei der Durchführung von Aktivitäten der Entscheidungsfindung, indem Vorgehensweisen bei bestimmten Aufgaben vorgegeben oder Teilprozesse der Entscheidungsfindung sogar automatisiert durchgeführt werden. Das Konzept der Technik, die systematische Ableitung von den Interessen der Stakeholder sowie das Zusammenspiel mit Visualisierungen wird in dieser Arbeit in Form einer erweiterten Konzeptualisierung der Architekturbeschreibung definiert.
Da die Werkzeugunterstützung in der Praxis häufig eine Herausforderung darstellt, rundet diese Arbeit ein eigens konzipiertes und prototypisch validiertes Architekturcockpit ab. Das Cockpit ist eine auf einem elektronischen Sitzungsraum basierende Werkzeugunterstützung der eingeführten integrativen Methode.
Modeling interactive Enterprise Architecture visualizations: an extended architecture description
(2018)
Enterprise architectures consist of a multitude of architecture elements, which relate in manifold ways to each other. Due to the high number of relationships between these elements, architectural analysis mechanisms are essential for all stakeholders to keep track and to work out relevant model characteristics. In practice EAs are often analyzed using visualizations by hand. However, the visualizations are often static and there are only few interaction possibilities. As a result, new visualizations have to be created or configured by experts if information demands change. In addition, hardly any tools are used for analysis of complex model characteristics. In this article we introduce an extended conceptualization of the architecture description that defines the structure of interactive visualizations and the integration of further tools to flexibly respond to the information demands of stakeholders. In addition, we develop a so-called Architecture Cockpit that realizes the extended conceptualization in a prototype. At the end we demonstrate and evaluate our approach through a practical test in a company in the finance and insurance industry.
Die Digitalisierung, der ständige technologische Fortschritt und immer kürzere Produktlebenszyklen stellen Unternehmen derzeit vor große Herausforderungen. Um am Markt erfolgreich zu sein, müssen Geschäftsmodelle häufiger und schneller als früher an veränderte Marktbedingungen angepasst werden. Schnelle Anpassungsfähigkeit, auch Agilität genannt, ist in der heutigen Zeit ein entscheidender Wettbewerbsfaktor. Aufgrund des ständig wachsenden IT-Anteils von Produkten und der Tatsache, dass diese mit Hilfe von IT hergestellt werden, hat die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells große Auswirkungen auf die Unternehmensarchitektur (EA). Die Entwicklung von EAs ist jedoch eine sehr komplexe Aufgabe, da viele Beteiligte mit gegensätzlichen Interessen in den Entscheidungsprozess eingebunden sind. Daher ist ein hohes Maß an Zusammenarbeit erforderlich. Um Unternehmen bei der Entwicklung ihrer EA zu unterstützen, wird in diesem Artikel eine neuartige integrative Methode vorgestellt, die die Interessen der Stakeholder systematisch in die Entscheidungsfindung einbezieht. Durch die Anwendung der Methode wird die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den beteiligten Interessengruppen verbessert, indem Berührungspunkte zwischen ihnen identifiziert werden. Darüber hinaus machen die standardisierten Aktivitäten die Entscheidungsfindung transparenter und vergleichbarer, ohne die Kreativität einzuschränken.
In modern times markets are very dynamic. This situation requires agile enterprises to have the ability to react fast on market influences. Thereby an enterprise’ IT is especially affected, because new or changed business models have to be realized. However, enterprise architectures (EA) are complex structures consisting of many artifacts and relationships between them. Thus analyzing an EA becomes to a complex task for stakeholders. In addition, many stakeholders are involved in decision-making processes, because Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) targets providing a holistic view of the enterprise. In this article we use concepts of Adaptive Case Management (ACM) to design a decision-making case consisting of a combination of different analysis techniques to support stakeholders in decision-making. We exemplify the case with a scenario of a fictive enterprise.
Enterprise architecture management (EAM) is a holistic approach to tackle the complex Business and IT architecture. The transformation of an organization’s EA towards a strategy-oriented system is a continuous task. Many stakeholders have to elaborate on various parts of the EA to reach the best decisions to shape the EA towards an optimized support of the organizations’ capabilities. Since the real world is too complex, analyzing techniques are needed to detect optimization potentials and to get all information needed about an issue. In practice visualizations are commonly used to analyze EAs. However these visualizations are mostly static and do not provide analyses. In this article we combine analyzing techniques from literature and interactive visualizations to support stakeholders in EA decision-making.
Enterprise Architectures (EA) consists of many architecture elements, which stand in manifold relationships to each other. Therefore Architecture Analysis is important and very difficult for stakeholders. Due changing an architecture element has impacts on other elements different stakeholders are involved. In practice EAs are often analyzed using visualizations. This article aims at contributing to the field of visual analytics in EAM by analyzing how state of-the-art software platforms in EAM support stakeholders with respect to providing and visualizing the “right” information for decision-making tasks. We investigate the collaborative decision-making process in an experiment with master students using professional EAM tools by developing a research study and accomplishing them in a master’s level class with students.
In times of dynamic markets, enterprises have to be agile to be able to quickly react to market influences. Due to the increasing digitization of products, the enterprise IT often is affected when business models change. Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) targets a holistic view of the enterprise’ IT and their relations to the business. However, Enterprise Architectures (EA) are complex structures consisting of many layers, artifacts and relationships between them. Thus, analyzing EA is a very complex task for stakeholders. Visualizations are common vehicles to support analysis. However, in practice visualization capabilities lack flexibility and interactivity. A solution to improve the support of stakeholders in analyzing EAs might be the application of visual analytics. Starting from a systematic literature review, this article investigates the features of visual analytics relevant for the context of EAM.
Analysis and planning of Enterprise Architectures (EA) is a complex task for stakeholders. The change of one architecture element has impact on multiple other elements because of manifold relationships and interactions between them. The interactive cockpit approach presented in this paper supports stakeholders planning and analyzing EAs and to tackle the intrinsic complexity. This approach supplies a cockpit with multiple viewpoints to put relevant information side-by-side without losing the context combined with interaction functionality. In this paper, we develop such cockpit starting with relevant use cases, describing a potential design based on well-established foundations in EA modeling, and outline an exemplary usage scenario.
Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) systems are key to managing risks threatening modern enterprises from many different angles. Key constituent to GRC systems is the definition of controls that are implemented on the different layers of an Enterprise Architecture (EA). As part of the compliance aspect of GRC, the effectiveness of these controls is assessed and reported to relevant management bodies within the enterprise. In this paper we present a metamodel which links controls to the affected elements of an EA and supplies a way of expressing associated assessment techniques and results. We complement the metamodel with an expository instantiation in a cockpit for control compliance applied in an international enterprise in the insurance industry.
New or adapted digital business models have huge impacts on Enterprise Architectures (EA) and require them to become more agile, flexible, and adaptable. All these changes are happening frequently and are currently not well documented. An EA consists of a lot of elements with manifold relationships between them. Thus changing the business model may have multiple impacts on other architectural elements. The EA engineering process deals with the development, change and optimization of architectural elements and their dependencies. Thus an EA provides a holistic view for both business and IT from the perspective of many stakeholders, which are involved in EA decision-making processes. Different stakeholders have specific concerns and are collaborating today in often unclear decision-making processes. In our research we are investigating information from collaborative decision-making processes to support stakeholders in taking current decisions. In addition we provide all information necessary to understand how and why decisions were taken. We are collecting the decision-related information automatically to minimize manual time intensive work as much as possible. The core contribution of our research extends a decisional metamodel, which links basic decisions with architectural elements and extends them with an associated decisional case context. Our aim is to support a new integral method for multi perspective and collaborative decision-making processes. We illustrate this by a practice-relevant decision-making scenario for Enterprise Architecture Engineering.
Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) systems are key to managing risks threatening modern enterprises from many different angles. Key constituent to GRC systems is the definition of controls that are implemented on the different layers of an Enterprise Architecture (EA). Controls become part of a “concern” of the EA, which allows to use an EA viewpoint to cover control compliance assessments. In this article we explore this relationship further, derive a metamodel linking control and EA, and elicit how this linkage give rise to a hierarchic understanding of the viewpoint concept for EAs. We complement these considerations with an expository instantiation in a cockpit for control compliance applied in an international enterprise in the insurance industry.
Companies are continuously changing their strategy, processes, and information systems to benefit from the digital transformation. Controlling the digital architecture and governance is the fundamental goal. Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) systems are vital for managing digital risks threatening in modern enterprises from many different angles. The most significant constituent to GRC systems is the definition of controls that is implemented on different layers of a digital Enterprise Architecture (EA). As part of the compliant aspect of GRC, the effectiveness of these controls is assessed and reported to relevant management bodies within the enterprise. In this paper, we present a metamodel which links controls to the affected elements of a digital EA and supplies a way of expressing associated assessment techniques and results. We complement a metamodel with an expository instantiation of a control compliance cockpit in an international insurance enterprise.
Enterprise Architectures (EA) consist of a multitude of architecture elements, which relate in manifold ways to each other. As the change of a single element hence impacts various other elements, mechanisms for architecture analysis are important to stakeholders. The high number of relationships aggravates architecture analysis and makes it a complex yet important task. In practice EAs are often analyzed using visualizations. This article contributes to the field of visual analytics in enterprise architecture management (EAM) by reviewing how state-of-the-art software platforms in EAM support stakeholders with respect to providing and visualizing the “right” information for decision-making tasks. We investigate the collaborative decision-making process in an experiment with master students using professional EAM tools by developing a research study. We evaluate the students’ findings by comparing them with the experience of an enterprise architect.
Many organizations identified the opportunities of big data analytics to support the business with problem-specific insights through the exploitation of generated data. Socio-technical solutions are developed in big data projects to reach competitive advantage. Although these projects are aligned to specific business needs, common architectural challenges are not addressed in a comprehensive manner. Enterprise architecture management is a holistic approach to tackle the complex business and IT architecture. The transformation of an organization's EA is influenced by big data projects and their data-driven approach on all layers. To enable strategy oriented development of the EA it is essential to synchronize these projects supported by EA management. In
this paper, we conduct a systematic review of big data literature to analyze which requirements for the EA management discipline are proposed. Thereby, a broad overview about existing research is presented to facilitate a more detailed exploration and to foster the evolution o the EA management discipline.
Organizations identified the opportunities of big data analytics to support the business with problem-specific insights through the exploitation of generated data. Sociotechnical solutions are developed in big data projects to reach competitive advantage. Although these projects are aligned to specific business needs, common architectural challenges are not addressed in a comprehensive manner. Enterprise architecture management is a holistic approach to tackle complex business and IT architectures. The transformation of an organization’s EA is influenced by big data transformation processes and their data-driven approach on all layers. In this paper, we review big data literature to analyze which requirements for the EA management discipline are proposed. Based on a systematic literature identification, conceptual categories of requirements for EA management are elicited utilizing an inductive category formation. These conceptual categories of requirements constitute a category system that facilitates a new perspective on EA management and fosters the innovation-driven evolution of the EA management.
discipline.
Analysis is an important part of the enterprise architecture management process. Prior to decisions regarding transformation of the enterprise architecture, the current situation and the outcomes of alternative action plans have to be analysed. Many analysis approaches have been proposed by researchers and current enterprise architecture management tools implement analysis functionalities. However, few work has been done structuring and classifying enterprise architecture analysis approaches. This paper collects and extends existing classification schemes, presenting a framework for enterprise architecture analysis classification. For evaluation, a collection of enterprise architecture analysis approaches has been classified based on this framework. As a result, the description of these approaches has been assessed, a common set of important categories for enterprise architecture analysis classification has been derived and suggestions for further development are drawn.
Digital technologies are main strategic drivers for digitalization and offer ubiquitous data availability, unlimited connectivity, and massive processing power for a fundamentally changing business. This leads to the development and application of intelligent digital systems. The current state of research and practice of architecting digital systems and services lacks a solid methodological foundation that fully accommodates all requirements linked to efficient and effective development of digital systems in organizations. Research presented in this paper addresses the question, how management of complexity in digital systems and architectures can be supported from a methodological perspective. In this context, the current focus is on a better understanding of the causes of increased complexity and requirements to methodological support. For this purpose, we take an enterprise architecture perspective, i.e. how the introduction of digital systems affects the complexity of EA. Two industrial case studies and a systematic literature analysis result in the proposal of an extended Digital Enterprise Architecture Cube as framework for future methodical support.